Boeing: how not to run a national champion | 波音:国民品牌的反面教材 - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

Boeing: how not to run a national champion
波音:国民品牌的反面教材

The aircraft maker needs a deeper cultural overhaul, starting at the top
这家飞机制造商需要从高层开始进行更深入的文化改革
00:00

“If it’s not Boeing, I’m not going,” was long a cherished slogan of the aircraft giant. Not everyone agrees today: French finance minister Bruno Le Maire said this week that he preferred “flying in Airbus over Boeing — my family too, they care about me”. The quip probably reflected often bitter transatlantic rivalries over plane-making. But five years after twin Boeing 737 Max 8 plane crashes killed 346 people, and two months after a door panel on another model blew out mid-flight, the company’s woes seem to be deepening. As the Southwest Airlines CEO has put it, Boeing needs to “get the issues understood and get the issues fixed”.

An initial probe into January’s door plug blowout concluded four bolts meant to attach it had not been fitted. In the months before, Boeing had had issues with misdrilled bulkhead holes and a missing rudder control nut. The mishaps keep coming. The US regulator, the Federal Aviation Administration, warned last week of improperly installed wiring bundles on 737 Max planes. And 50 passengers were hurt when a 787 flying from Australia to New Zealand suddenly plunged, after which Boeing told airlines to inspect switches on 787 pilots’ seats.

The FAA said an audit of Boeing and its key supplier Spirit AeroSystems had found multiple alleged failures to comply with manufacturing quality requirements; it has given Boeing bosses 90 days to draw up a plan to fix quality issues. An expert panel found a “disconnect” between top managers and staff and “inadequate and confusing” safety processes.

Resultant delays in Boeing deliveries are affecting airlines and passengers. Half a dozen US and European carriers have warned that their plans to increase capacity are in doubt. Airline trust in Boeing management and its CEO Dave Calhoun is being sorely tested.

The roots of the problems are well catalogued. A shift in culture after Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas in 1997 put financial returns ahead of engineering prowess. The company relied more on suppliers to build parts, and spun off some operations into separate businesses — such as Spirit — as it focused on final assembly. The FAA delegated too much 737 Max safety certification work to Boeing itself. Lina Khan, Federal Trade Commission chair, presents Boeing as a cautionary tale of the pitfalls of “national champions”; turning it into a too-big-to-fail domestic monopoly in commercial aircraft lessened the pressure for innovation and excellence.

Airbus is a European “champion” too, assembled from mergers and aided by state support, and uses a network of outsourced suppliers that also includes Spirit. Yet, while it has made its own past strategic mis-steps, Airbus has avoided the quality and safety traps Boeing has fallen into. In response, the US company has not stood still. It created a board-level aerospace safety committee and a chief safety officer role. It has centralised safety reporting functions; engineers now report to the chief engineer, who reports directly to Calhoun.

But recent months have made clear how much remains to be done. To regain its manufacturing verve, Boeing should bring Spirit back in-house (talks are under way), improve its approach to quality assurance and rebuild relations with squeezed suppliers. Above all, it needs a wider cultural reboot, starting with an overhaul of top management.

Calhoun, a former GE executive, stabilised the company and repaired relations with regulators after the 737 Max 8 crashes. But as a Boeing director since 2009, he was on the board when the crashes happened and — though Covid intervened — has had four years at the helm to fix the problems. His time to demonstrate that he can do so is fast running out.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

欧洲病夫?德国企业老板针对高病假率发出警告

一项研究称,如果不是因为病假率高于平均水平,德国经济去年将增长0.5%,而非收缩0.3%。

依视路陆逊梯卡估值达千亿欧元,押注眼镜将取代智能手机

该眼镜巨头的首席执行官米莱里表示,与Meta公司合作开发的可穿戴技术将促进增长。

朝鲜向俄派兵后,韩国考虑直接援乌武器

韩国认为,朝鲜向俄派兵和可能的俄朝技术转让对韩国的安全构成直接威胁。

再次陷入危机的大众汽车能走上改革之路吗?

欧洲最大的汽车制造商正与工人和政界人士交战,试图渡过痛苦的电动汽车转型期。

哈里斯的另一个大选对手:通货膨胀

美国选民对高昂生活成本的不满可能决定下周谁将赢得白宫。

Lex专栏:Meta和微软通过季度理智检查

科技巨头今天吹捧真正的胜利,以证明明天的巨额投资是合理的。投资者对此是支持的,但程度有限。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×