America’s dead heat Trump-Harris election | 2024年美国大选:特朗普与哈里斯的激烈角逐 - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

America’s dead heat Trump-Harris election
2024年美国大选:特朗普与哈里斯的激烈角逐

In a country divided into mutually hostile camps, no easy resolution to the polarisation seems likely
在2024年美国大选的激烈竞争中,前总统唐纳德·特朗普与现任副总统卡马拉·哈里斯的对决反映了美国社会的两极分化。无论谁最终胜出,选举的结果都可能引发宪法危机,并进一步加剧国内的政治敌对。本文探讨了大选的四种可能结果及其对美国政治和社会的深远影响,揭示了选举背后隐藏的复杂局势与风险。
00:00

Do not bet a dollar on the US election. With such narrow odds, you would need to risk many for a tiny upside. You can wager a lot, however, on America being as riven after the election as before. Whether the victor is Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, the race’s closeness stems from deep US polarisation. A big majority of American voters would walk over hot coals before voting for the other candidate. Half the country will treat the winner as a fraud. 

The last time America had an election this tight was in 2000. Those were calmer days. The Florida recount was nevertheless ended by a controversial Supreme Court ruling. Picture how such a dispute would unfold in 2024. Instead of the “Brooks Brothers riots” — where besuited Republican men flew in to disrupt the Miami-Dade County recount — militias would gather at disputed precincts. Weaponisation of election-counting is now a feature of US life. 

Only one of the four outcomes on November 5 would be likely to yield old-fashioned US governance. That would be Harris winning the White House with Democrats keeping the Senate and retaking the House of Representatives. A Democratic sweep would allow the business of governing to resume and restrict Trump’s scope to contest his defeat. But this is the least likely scenario. The presidential and House races are both toss-ups. The Senate map is heavily skewed towards Republicans. 

The second is that Harris wins the presidency but Democrats lose the Senate. Even if Democrats regained the House, Republicans could block her appointees and bills in the upper chamber — and they would. Harris’s domestic agenda would be dead on arrival. Global instability would make foreign policy an unenticing alternative. A narrow Harris victory would also increase the risk of a constitutional crisis. Hundreds of Republican lawyers are working on challenges to a Harris victory. Last weekend Trump predicted that “radical left lunatics” would steal the election. They should be handled by the national guard and “if really necessary, by the military”, he said. Unlike in 2020, Trump has no control over either. But he will use whatever tool is available to overturn a Harris victory. 

The third is that Trump regains the White House while the parties swap control on Capitol Hill — Republicans regain the Senate; Democrats recapture the House. The 2024 electoral map makes that more likely than the reverse. Either way, Trump could push through much of his agenda. Divided government always works better for Republican presidents than Democrats. But one Democrat-controlled chamber could still act as a drag on Trump’s most radical plans. 

The last scenario is a Republican trifecta. This is about as unlikely as a Harris sweep. I would give each roughly one in five odds. A Maga stranglehold on Washington would bring America into uncharted waters. All three branches of government would be in Trump’s corner. He already has the 6-3 Supreme Court on his side. The court recently ruled that America’s president has criminal immunity from almost any “official” acts, including assassinating his opponents.

You do not need to believe that Trump would go to such lengths to see the ruling as a green light to do what he wants. Without judicial or legislative brakes on his actions, Trump would take it as a sweeping licence to go after his enemies. Mark Milley, who was chairman of the joint chiefs of staff under Trump, last week described him as “fascist to the core”. Milley is one of several ex-Trump officials whom the former president has branded a traitor. Trump’s Maga appointees would use the mandate to implement Project 2025 — the Heritage Foundation’s plan to turn the US into an illiberal democracy. 

The question is what, if anything, could bring the nation’s domestic cold war to an end. Most Americans would say that the only fix is for the other side to surrender. Trump should be thrown into jail; liberals must repent of their mental disorder; and so on. There can be no splitting of difference with evil. For Trump, defeat could mean eventual jail. To Democrats, a Trump sweep could end hopes of regaining power in a fair election. 

Since each party believes the worst of the other, they are playing for keeps, not just the next four years. It is hard to look at America’s numbers, or feel its mood, and envisage an easy end to its impasse. Other democracies experience big swings in party loyalty. Almost nothing in the US — whether assassination attempts, a switch in presidential nominee or awful debate performances — moves the dial. The 2024 race is a toss-up between mutually hostile Americas. 

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Thrive Capital:多样化是给那些不知道自己在做什么的人准备的

乔什•库什纳旗下的这家年轻的风投公司以大手笔投资OpenAI而闻名,颠覆了传统的风险投资模式。它能得到真正的收益吗?

谁要买Chrome?

关于储蓄的思考。

将谷歌和Chrome浏览器分开是好办法吗?

呼吁这家搜索巨头剥离Chrome浏览器,会给用户带来他们显然不想要的东西。

高增长并不能说明美国经济的全貌

令人印象深刻的头条数字对民主党没有帮助。

没有学位也没问题:美国雇主不再局限于大学文凭

IBM、通用汽车和沃尔玛等公司正专注于申请人的技能,而不是教育。

阿达尼丑闻将动摇印度股市替代中国的努力

就在几个月前,印度股票被视为全球投资者投资组合中中国股票的可行替代,但此次事件使人们重新关注当地股票的风险和高昂估值。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×